Gary Thorne makes a retraction

After causing a huge stir across baseball with his comments Wednesday night during the red Sox Orioles game (see the conversation below) Gary Thorne retracted his statement yesterday. Thorne backed off his comments Thursday saying Mirabelli was joking. “He said one thing, and I heard something else. I reported what I heard and what I honestly felt was said,” Thorne said. “Having talked with him today, there’s no doubt in my mind that’s not what he said, that’s not what he meant. He explained that it was in the context of the sarcasm and the jabbing that goes on in the clubhouse.” “I took it as something serious, and it wasn’t,” Thorne said.

Mirabelli confirmed the story, saying, “He knows that I believe 100 percent that I thought the sock had blood on it. It never crossed my mind that there wasn’t blood on that sock. If he misinterpreted something said inside the clubhouse, it’s unfortunate.”

Mirabelli said he spoke with Thorne in the Boston clubhouse about six months after the 2004 playoffs.

Here is my question, if Mirabelli said this three years ago why did Thorne choose Wednesday night to make it public? He waited two and half years. Why wait until a night when Schilling is pitching to bring this out? Thorne knew then that Mirabelli was joking and that his comments were not intended to be taken seriously. Why not include that in his comments Wednesday night? Thorne is a very well respected commentator and in some ways has tarnished his image and legacy just a bit with this fiasco.

If you want to see Curt Schillings take on all this click over to his blog 38 Pitches.

Sox cruise past O’s and Gary Thorne causes a stir

The Sox scored three runs in the seventh and two runs in the ninth to win the first of a two game series at Camden Yards against the Orioles. Curt Schiling went 7 innings giving up 5 hits, one run (earned) and striking out three. Hideki Okijima looked great in middle relief striking out two. As of yesterday the Sox pen has the lowest era in the majors. That is quiet a statement as the pen was the biggest cause for concern going into the season. Okajima has certainly been a star so far this year for the Sox. Both Manny and Mike Lowell had two RBI’s and Kevin Youkilis went three for four and an RBI. Here is the boxscore.

The real story of the game though was not on the field but in the announcers booth. In the fifth inning while the Orioles were batting Gary Thorne a nationally known broadcaster said:

“The great story we were talking about the other night was that famous red stocking that he wore when they finally won, the blood on his stocking,” Thorne said to his on air partner Jim Palmer, the Hall of Fame pitcher, in a conversation that had begun with a discussion of Schilling’s blog of all things.

“Nah,” Thorne said. “It was painted. Doug Mirabelli confessed up to it after. It was all for PR. Two-ball, two-strike count.”

Palmer: “Yeah, that was the 2004 World Series [sic].” Thorne: “Yeah.”

During a break two innings later, Thorne confirmed that’s what he said, and that Mirabelli had told him so in a conversation “a couple of years ago.”

“Go ask him [Mirabelli],” Thorne said.

Mirabelli was shocked, then angry, when relayed Thorne’s comments.

“What? Are you kidding me? He’s [expletive] lying. A straight lie,” Mirabelli said. “I never said that. I know it was blood. Everybody knows it was blood.”

The sock has been scrutinezed previously before making its way to Cooperstown and into the Baseball Hall of Fame. The performance Schilling had that night was one of the greatest in MLB history. Thorne has thrown into question the validity of the injury and in some respects the performance itself. Where and when did Thorne get this statement from Mirabelli? And why did it just come out now? The Sox have indicated they will seek a retraction from Thorne. Unless Thorne can come up with concrete evidence that the substance on the sock is not blood an apology is in order as well.